Every Friggin Grocery Shopping App is Broken.

Posted by

There is so much money going into all these grocery startups, but i have a feeling that fundamentally the whole experience is flawed. Browsing through categories in an app is so tedious that I’d give up, if I have to do this every week over and over again.

I actually tried shopping for the list once, using Bigbasket.com – It was hopeless. I realized half the items were not available. My cook is also picky to the point of the brand of flour we use. at home my mom does the same thing. It is better not to buy at all, rather than buy a different brand.
So, I gave up and went to the grocery store. it took me far less time picking things out of a grocery store with a cart, than it did with an app. Well, caveat, I know what is where in which aisle in the grocery store by now, but I’m never able to predict what goes into what category in an app.

See, weirdly a grocery store is not categorized. If you notice closely you will realize there is a flow, it starts with ice creams, bread, eggs, milk right near the entrance (stuff that is often bought), and once you go past, its the munchies, and then the coffee stuff, leading to the pickles, leading to oil, spices, rice, grains and pulses, and the you’ll see islands where the detergents and other stuff are kept. Its like there is an invisible flow, you kinda can anticipate what comes next. You don’t hop from one aisle to another (like a category), you naturally flow into it.

The only time you look up (for category aisles) are when you are lost, or are coming to a store for the first time.

A really good grocery app – for that matter even if Flipkart goes mobile app only, has to be like that. Easy to browse, without killing us with categories and trying to make us guess. Nobody has that kind of patience.

Well, that’s a design problem. If you cant solve that, here’s a cheaper, faster, easier way to do this. Let me click the list I get from my maid and at times my mom and upload it to you. You either do magic or have people sitting there who convert it into a list and tell me price / amount. I can then add / remove things to the “basket” and check out. Imagine, me clicking and sending you a photo of a list with quantities and brands marked next to it. You can send me back a list with whatever you can recognize (I can’t guess a few things on the list at times), and suggest alternatives for what you dont have. I can quickly accept, reject, opt out and should be good to go. You don’t even keep inventory and are sourcing from nearby merchants, cant you atleast make my life easier by making the shopping list process easier rather than making me pay by putting out an app that belongs in the mid 90s?

Upsell, me on the add-ons and whats beyond the list (essentially the shelf near the cash counter when last minute tic tacs and gums are bought), cause I am quite set on those essentials and am just wasting time, browsing through categories.

Whoever gets that right, will blow all these bigbasket and peppertap fellows out of the water.

 
22 Kudos
Don't
move!

Thoughts on Finding a Mentor

Posted by

To get a mentor, and to even make use of them well, you need to be able to ask the right questions. You need to mature first on your perspective as an entrepreneur (and fundamentally a human being) in order to be able to do that.

No mentor, or respectable one, enjoys spending time with a child. The one thing every mentor revels in, is in seeing a perspective that is deeper than his, but lacks experience. That’s where mentorship becomes a mutually beneficial relationship; One built on respect, rather than old school rules of unconditional devotion.

“When I was a child, I talked like a child, I thought like a child, I reasoned like a child. When I became a man, I put the ways of childhood behind me.” 1 Corinthians 13:11

“The student is not above the teacher, but everyone who is fully trained will be like their teacher.” Luke 6:40

 
4 Kudos
Don't
move!

Getting your first 300 Customers (B2C)

Posted by

A lot depends on the kind of business you are running, the target segment etc. I’d do as much as refining and narrowing down as early as possible – because every segment that isnt a direct fit, but is getting bombarded either walks away with negativity and more importantly is a waste of valuable money.

I’d leverage your social media for all its worth. Craft a messaging that targets the first segment of market that you believe is a very close fit to. Identify two more such market segments. Download your entire social database – be it on linkedin, facebook, email etc, and see if you can find 200 people (handpick them) who fit into each of these segments.

For eg. Lets say you are running a baby care portal, and you segment it by demographics, age group etc, and narrow it down to two or three different key segments that you believe will strongly convert, the key is to identify 200 of such segments from your own network. Add offline ones like family, relatives, friends all into that mix. This is very important.

Send out the link, talk to them, hand out brochures, and see for two signs:

1. Visits and final conversions (in this case, a transaction)
2. Repeat purchases and visits – is any of them coming back a second time and buying anything or transacting with your system.

Take all three segments, and track back to which segment has the highest visits and final conversions (one time), and which one is doing better on the repeat puchases and visits. (You can finetune visits to purchases later on).

Once you identify one segment, then its a matter of how to scale this up. You have numbers on total visits and conversions, so you’ll know the math on what is a “sustainable” number to bid for when you do ads. You should also keep in mind that this “baseline” is the best possible scenario – most probably your conversions will be lower, since it will be to strangers, rather than to folks you know of.

Take that one segment, run two three different kinds of campaigns, and two three different kinds of channels and see what works. Keep fine tuning, keep what works, kill what doesnt. Rinse, repeat.

The third way to grow is strategic tie ups. Lets assume that once you figure who your Wow customer is (the customer who will love you for the service you are building and will cry when you shut down), if you know of a existing entity that caters to that same audience, you can figure if there is a way to do a joint marketing program, or an affiliate program to get some of that customers with a big bump. But most will charge an upfront fee, so its important that you know it will convert well upfront, or you’ll lose money again.

Hope this helps. Its not exhaustive, but you get a sense of what marketing and customer onboarding in a consumer company is like. Perhaps others can add to this.

PS: Dont bother yourself with what worked for others. Most marketing campaigns only work once. What happened for whatsapp wont work for hike. And that time and instance rarely repeats. Case in point is Dropbox giving extra space for referrals, but the same strategy for box never worked.

So instead of trying to replicate Whatsapp’s strategy, go back to the fundamentals and figure what makes a lot of sense for your service and product instead.

 
65 Kudos
Don't
move!

What’s wrong with Airtel Zero and Internet.org

Posted by

I’ve been getting a lot of folks asking me why Airtel Zero is a bad idea and why it goes against Net Neutrality.

Most folks actually believe it is an innovation by the operators and those of us in the camp asking for NetNeutrality are trying to thwart it. Well, Im hoping a slightly different perspective would help.

In order to understand netneutrality, there is something that we all must understand well – which is the notion of commons. There are certain things, assets and infrastructure that belongs to everyone. Weather is one. The way we handle minerals and natural resources is another. The air we breathe is another – these are things where the decisions and activities of one, could affect everyone and as such requires high levels of regulation in order to keep it as a common asset.

Failure to do so, usually results in folks benefitting disproportionately from the same and using that to suppress access to what was once, something that belonged to everyone.

So in an effort to make Why Airtel Zero and Internet.org violate Net Neutrality, let me explain it with a common example. Roads and toll gates. Take a well known road – if you are in delhi, take the gurgaon toll for example and assume that one day the toll gate guy realized that he wanted to go public and needed a business model that would show “growth” in revenue without substantially doing anything more on the services he was providing – having a toll, maintaining the road and collecting the cash. So he figures, there is a smart thing one can do – switch the model from being B2C (which is consumer focused and consumer focused businesses are always over a period of time lowering in cost and becoming commodities) to being B2B. How does one do that?

Well, look at the companies that are setup in Gurgaon, and go to them and offer that there is a plan that they can let their employees go to and fro via the tolls as many times as they want, as long as the companies pay the toll. And since they are businesses, they pay a slight premium. anything to enterprises are higher priced than to consumers.

Lets assume a few companies take this up. Soon enough word gets around, the people commuting and having to pass through the toll start using that as an excuse to switch companies. It starts showing up in Exit interviews that the present company doesnt offer free toll passes, whereas the new company does.

Once it gets to this, the junta follows. Every HR manager gets on the call to said toll gate company to ask how they can too enlist. Toll guy now has the upper hand, and can auction, bid or negotiate rates as they see fit. it might have cost the individuals Rs. 40 to pass through, but tollgate company can now ask for a fixed upfront fee as they see demand (and fit).

What do companies that are on the stretch who cant afford the toll do? They would either have to get along with the plan, or they have to find another destination where they can setup their offices – most probably closer to the city where there is no commute, or in a remote place but the cost of setting up and luring talent there is going to be a headache. Good luck to you on that.

This is the danger with Airtel Zero and Internet.org. Airtel Zero and Internet.org are the network equivalent of Justdial. And just as keywords are given out for bids, Airtel and Reliance will shamelessly set on auction the traffic that they get. And that messes up the environment for everyone. Costs go up, entry to barriers are built and the internet is no longer the open innovation platform that we all started off with.

This is when we come back to what we started off with. But isnt this something that is an “Innovation” by telecom operators? Well, no. because the Internet is not upto them to sell in pieces to anyone. The Internet doesnt belong to the operators, or to the government. It belongs to everyone globally and that is the reason why it is what it is. The Internet is a “common good” and that’s why this is an issue.

If you still cant wrap your head around this, imagine someone selling you access to breathing air, and the implications of it because they have every incentive to pollute to sell more, premium air.

Im reminded that this isnt a war and battle that started recently. Microsoft wanted to create an alternate gateway to the internet called Mozaic. And Mozilla was created to create an open internet free from the platform being commercialized. Mozilla was a short hand for “Mozaic Killer” and if you think I am making this up, type about:firefox in your Firefox browser. And read the manifesto.

I’m all for innovation. And operators SHOULD innovate. But slicing and dicing what belongs to everyone and serving it in a platter and calling it innovation, and overcharging, and restricting access – is not it.

Additional Notes:

A lot of folks are making the case as to why “Free” Internet will be good for Rural India.

1. Somehow, this whole empathetic view of rural India scares me. It verges in the same lines as how we see development and the debate on aid vs enabling. If rural india saw the opportunity to make a living (either by listing as a merchant or saving money by buying on for eg FK), wouldn’t they do it on their own?

2. Someone with vested interests giving away a “utility” for free, also taints it. Its like Monsanto saying they are going to give away FREE seeds to farmers. It is a small cost, but we also know how that plays into the mindset of emerging markets that they never see anything beyond that and it becomes the prerogative and entry barrier to startups and other players who can’t or don’t want to offer FREE data access.

 
36 Kudos
Don't
move!