The Case for Startups – The Prelude.
by Vijay Anand
Over the past three years, it has been quite a journey interacting with startups, some of the key stakeholders and in a lot of ways understanding some of the constraints that we are facing in building up this landscape. There is undoubtedly a lot of enthusiasm, an unparalleled momentum within the community and daring spirits aspiring to build world-class companies. No doubt about it.
But we are not nearly where we’d like to be.
Lets also have a bit of background here. We must humbly acknowledge that certain things existed even before we all arrived at the scene. There is nothing new under the sun says Solomon who was apparently one of the wisest man to roam the earth and he possibly could have been true. A report by the committee on National Enterprises clocks the number of Small and Medium enterprises in India at 32 Million. Yep, you read that right, its 32 million! 40% of the gross manufacturing GDP is a contribution of this sector of the industry. One of every ten Indian is employed by an SME. If you thought startups became fashionable in the past three years, we would be very misguided. That said, there is a sudden trend and confidence emerging that India too can build world-class companies. That sentiment is a recent one.
Though it was the camp at Proto.in, that initiated some of the key initiatives to drive this change, its no doubt that today there are several entities – all very key elements who have started to play a role in shaping this landscape. The purpose of this series is hopefully to point out some of the obvious things that we are going to have to work towards – so that we dont contend ourselves thinking that we’ve arrived.
I’ve thought about it, mulled it, discussed, debated and fought over it, but simplistically it comes down to this. Startups need two very crucial elements that we need to build in order to nurture them.
a) Media Focus
b) Capital
I’d also add a third component of Mentorship/Networks, but I am going to presume for a second that that onus can be laid upon the entrepreneur as there are several means and ways to compensate for that (linkedin, included) for now.
Media Focus:
Let me be very very honest here. There are several attempts by everyone involved in this space trying to get some coverage in the media, but there is a serious issue with the focus here. ET’s Ideas competition included, the focus somehow seems very much on the initiative than on the entrepreneurs. This goes for the Proto.in camp as well – while sometimes its nice to rest on our laurels, we have to constantly remind ourselves that we are just a mere platform and our success is when the companies we help succeed. We have got to do better in this. I know we can.
There are shows on television which as of now seem to be doing a better job at this than what most of the “showcase” events have managed to do, and its quite sad that thats the level of comparison we are at. Rest assured that there are also going to be equally enough efforts from the media to want to sensationalize it, and even make an emotional outcry out of entrepreneurs, dreams, hopes and dreams smashed, and its sooner or later meant to happen, but one of the things seriously lacking is the media network and lack of focus for startups.
Things we ought to do in this space:
a) There is a serious need for a authoritative blog that covers startups, and the emerging verticals.
b) There is also a need for a firm to start analysing the emerging market, as the value chains shift, and to help companies position themselves based on that. Such a company could almost become “the” means to start categorizing and analysing, comparing startups systematically.
c) We need more journalists who could write about entrepreneurship and startups with a solid understanding. There are very few right now (like Snigdha Sengupta) who can do such analysis as of now.
d) Everyone has this question. Every platform, Bplan Competition, Entrepreneurship summit seems to showcase 10-15 companies. What really happens to these companies after that? Do they get funded, attract clients, sign on anyone significant, strike any key alliances? There is space for a “Startup Tracker” to be in place. This will be crucial for the Media to start reporting indepth stories, and also for raising funds in the future (More on that in the upcoming series)
e) Events such as TiECon, Proto.in, Headstart have to put their heads together and figure out how to a) Get the startups coverage on national media b) Get coverage on overseas media – For Example. When PlasticLogic launched at DEMO, The Hindu Chennai edition had a coverage of what they presented the next day. Needless to say that company received enough backorders for their product, including bagging the order from Amazon and Sony within the next three months. If these native platforms are not able to offer that level of coverage, make no mistake, DEMO/TC50 will make its way to India to deliver that value.
There are projected plans to bring the employment rate in India to below 2%. In a global economy where countries are struggling to stabilize their unemployment rates, we are actually talking about almost making it disappear. SMEs will piay a significant part in it, and since Employment is a key value proposition of any government and referring to my previous article on who really owns a company, You can rest assured that the government will get involved and play its part to help. But the initial organizing of this sector has to be driven by all those who are claiming credits already. And clearly there is lots of work to do. Its time to get to work – and not stop at empty promises.
I have been privately ‘bitching’ about the missing media piece in the jigsaw — Totally baffles me the way mainstream treats startups — no big media company wants to cover small startups on a regular basis (they shud learn from NYTimes, Wash Post, SF Chronicle) & no startup blogs wanna cover “a” startup on a regular basis — the latter seems to have improved, but still far cry.
The biggest irony is that the main stream covers twitter, facebook, etc. regularly — whereas the bloggers shy away from it due to over echo of the same in US blogs.
Good take!
I am with you on this Indus. I think the media piece is probably the most nascent one. For all the talk we do, I am just saddened that we dont have one blogger who can represent the landscape right – running quizzes and writing shallow articles seem to be the theme for most of those that exist.
I don’t agree with you guys here.. Its not the responsibility of Media to cover start-ups. Its the responsibility of founders to make it happen. I’ve not faced this issue while promoting my start-up even though its not fancy-schmancy like some others.
In addition, There can not be one set of media vehicle that talks about all start-ups. That will never be effective because every start-up has different audience. One must identify the media relevant to the target market and try to get covered there.
I guess it’s for the startups to do something to attract the media. How may startups show material (unique in terms of revenue model, scalability or marketing strategy) that’s worth writing about? Going by what we have seen so far if some newspaper or TV channel starts tracking startup progress, it will be the briefest column/episode. How many column/cms can be wasted to just say “still no revenues/customers”?
Guys, Media is a tricky thing altogether. I have moved with a lot of journalists and media persons while promoting our dotcom letzknow. And believe me, there is ample support available for startups in media. But the only thing is that its not that EASY and straightforward always. Thats the whole issue. We got ourselves featured in around a dozen national & local print media and each one of them required an altogether different approach and persuasion.
In what i have understood about media is that you have a large chance of getting yourself or your startup published provided you could provide an interesting ‘story’ to write about rather than selling your product…
- Mani hk
Letzknow.com